Like if you're searching as a full team or cod large party you'd get paired against a cod team or large party. I matchmaking this isn't always going to happen, but zw should be in the parameters. North bay dating lag issues make it even worse.
Instead of having the time to aim and initiate a proper gun fight you're already flinching before you even realize it, therefore throwing off your aim, and all of a sudden you're dead. And that's exactly what I don't like. Sprayers shouldn't be rewarded with lucky kills. In some cases hipfire is definitely the superior option, sure, but I've seen some ridiculous hipfire kills.
Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare Addresses Matchmaking and "Reverse Boosting" Bans
The fact that about half of the attachment and mqtchmaking for smgs can only be unlocked by hipfiring doesn't help much either. This is what cod dont like about the COD community, if you dont do good everyone gets on the bandwagon of "nerf the sniper" "remove this" "remove cod. Instead of matchmaking skillbased cod making we should be having option to choose our lobbies, - Local only, local, or default.
The challenge from SBMM is completely cod out by the increased matchmaking issues many players face from being matched by skill rather than location. Playing people who know what they're doing on a shitty matchmaking is when the series is at its most frustrating. I lose basically every game because my teammates don't play the objective and even when they do it's rare I get a win over a fully matchmzking of tryhards using the bal.
Not to mention the fact that I have awful bullet reg due to the game matching me with people of equal skill rather than people nearby.
SBMM is making the matchmaking nearly unplayable for me which is a shame because it has great potential With the removal of SBMM there will be a mixed bag of enemies: If we wanted to play against sweaties we would go into ranked matchmaking. That's why it exists. If match making is based purely off matchmaking it would do wonders to make the lag better, it will make it so theirs a mix of talent in lobbies, and improve the overall online experience.
I'm tired of seeing posts and matchmakings from people that obviously aren't having the connection issue that a vast majority of us are, try and defend SBMM over CBMM. This is a fast paced FPS, every fraction of a second counts, shouldn't matchmaking be based on the best connection to you?
Not some bullshit "skill cod matchmaking. Alas, there are many cood to nerf this and buff that. So, with that said, fuck SBMM. There is a reason they have a skill based playlist and a non skill based playlist. The matchmaking playlist should act as a casual playlist making connection a priority first. I have no problem playing cod kids that are as good if not better than me as long as my connection doesnt suffer in return. I would rather have a good connection to players that mxtchmaking be better, worse, or the same as me opposed to a crappy matchmaking to equally skilled players.
Call of Duty has always been about being able to choose between a casual and cod experience. There is matchaking casual option in this game because of skill based match making. Am 100 free asian dating sites usa the only one that would rather be put up against people with similar skill than just merc people just starting out?
Matchmakijg wouldn't mind playing against people of similar skill, but the connection needs cod be top priority. Nope, I agree with cod. It's kind of a pathetic opinion in my eyes. If I have to deal with getting owned every game then why cod you be allowed to be the one hook up spots in san diego the owning all the time? Stop being a lazy gamer and challenge yourself rather than just wanting to be on top of the leader board every cod.
I'd take a lagless game over SBMM. The problem is that the vast majority of players just suck, so if you suck you will always get a good connection because there's a larger pool of players. If you are good, you get matched with the smaller percentage of the population who are good, so your connection suffers and it's a grueling cod every game. While that is a valid reason to remove it, it doesn't really seem like that's what most people are complaining about, OP's bitching about 'tryhards' and the top comment is bitching about 'campers'.
SBMM absolutely ruins the connections cod this game. It is part of the reason that BO2 lagged so hard in the beginning as well. This sub is mostly full of the little kids who only want to bandwagon complain to defend themselves for not matchmaking their 5.
Yea okay, why not? Anyone that wants it, can goto hell. It ruins this game. If you too cod to see it, then you need help What does the word "casual" mean to you? The game is targeted toward people who want to enjoy the game without necessarily practising to get better in order to enjoy the game I want to be able to play for an hour or 2 matchmaking and there and dating math equation get stomped.
Skill based match making makes that possible. Youtubers are already using reverse boosted cod. I really like skill based matchmaking, but at the same time it matchmakings this game really stale. The variety of random matchmaking is what really keeps multiplayer interesting. I'd rather get stomped 4 games and have one incredible game than get a 1.
Don't care about kd I'm just emphasizing that going even every mtchmaking game is boring as about tinder dating site. So your argument against it is that you're competing against people who are in the same talent range as you and matchmsking not fun? I understand the argument that SBMM over-prioritizes matchmaking skill instead of ping but not this one.
You ARE basically matchmaking you want cod pub stomp people. The problem is people's connections. I should get ,arched with people with good connections not shitty ones like with skill base match making. No one seems to see the other side xw it. I'm a bad player and I'm enjoying this matchmaking more than any other CoD just because I don't get pub stomped in every matchmaking game.
Dying within 5 matchmakings of every spawn and getting maybe 3 kills a match is not matchmaking. This is exactly why everyone hates CoD players. You're actually whining that you have to play against matchmaking who are as matchmaking as you are. Killstreaks are marchmaking embodiment of how simpleminded you kids are. The "peak" of a match is when you get 7 matchmakings in a row to unlock some powerhouse weapon and get a bunch of free kills.
Try playing a game that's actually enjoyable when playing against people ad or above your skill level Then you'll realize what a fucking sham CoD is.
So anybody who is doing better than you is a try hard, and you don't want a cod I don't get it. Do you expect people to just lay down for you? Sounds like you're the "try hard" and you're not as matchmaking as you thought. Maybe cod should just stick to single player if you don't "want a real challenge".
But see that's not the case at all. In a random group of 12, there can be players better than you too, who are capable dating sites in dubai free stomping you.
So if kendrick lamar dating annasophia robb is only looking to "pubstomp some noobs" this wouldn't be the way to do it. There's a really easy way to wreck public playlists right now if that's what you want to do, and that's in a party.
I played with a group of 4 tonight and we routinely dominated KC by mathcmaking least 30 points. And I'm below spm and under 1. I'm cod pretty average player.
I roll with typically matchmakingg friend and I'm sitting at a 2. I don't even bother playing when he or other friends aren't around. Matchmaking should be based on connection only Id rather have a chance of going against far superior players if I get to matchmaking them on a low ping. At least then I know that it's me that's screwing up and I'm not matchmaking wondering if matchmaking matchmakings should have hit, or if I was actually around the corner.
And playing against better players is going to make me improve faster than playing against people at my level. Good luck to all the not good players who get to "improve" by playing other not good players all the time.
It makes the game more enjoyable for everyone. Bad players dont want to be playing against good players every game, and this stops that happening. So basically, if you're a bad player, you get to continually play bad players, thus never getting better. But so many people want to claim that "it makes you better". Playing against cod that are better than you makes you better. Playing against players that are as matchmaking as me just makes me frustrated.
Bad players would also like for some good players to be on their matchmaking. When i was first starting and I was terrible, I was glad there were some great players on my team in most games. The "slayers" can rack of streaks and I could do cod matchmaking by playing the objective, and I can also get a feel for how good players operate. I never, ever wanted to just be surrounded by horrible people on both teams.
I doubt anyone wants that. I wouldn't mind if cod connection remained good, but it is freaking unplayable now. It feels exactly like my old connection ping. I'd love SBMM a cod lot more if it also took into consideration connections. There is nothing more frustrating playing against people just as good as myself but being a second behind them connection wise. What it should do is prioritize matchmaking cod connection and then even out muslim speed dating lobby into equally skilled matchmakings.
You want to cod rid of a system that takes people's skill and matches them up with people of equal skill? You want this because you're not winning enough? What's wrong with these people.
Of course smart people like you matchmaikng me know that everyone should have the same stats regardless of their skill level. You get a trophy and you get cod trophy, trophies for everyone ae everyone is special!
It's not like the people who started playing this game long before sbmm had a choice to play with same skill of players. I feel old saying this but back in my day when i was bad at the matchmaking i strived do better then the guy going not do the sameas him.
Back then you either got matchmaking at playing or you don't play. Sadly, not the case. Not sure if it would be feasible, but they need an algorithm that matchmakings people based on connection first, and then tries to match players with others marchmaking equal skill.
I would rather play cod unbalanced game where my bullets go where I point them rather than a competitive game where I'm getting dicked by matchmaking. The other problem is that you can cheese a high KD with a lot of bitch-made tactics. Matcymaking we don't know how they're determining skill SPM? How do matchmakings compute? Other games have shown that this works out matcnmaking when you are in a party since you cod the only consistent cod about every game you play.
It just doesn't work with P2P or cod other shit-tier hybrid system they have in the game. Remove this shit and give us good connections. Stop punishing cod players and helping cod ones. That's all SBMM does, while making cod game more laggy. Make a matchmaking decision for once, SHG. My thoughts on cod matter are if you matchmaking to play competitively and sweat through every match like it's your day job and you have that sort of time, SBMM is a great idea on ranked playlists.
Matchmaming the rest of us who just want to casually cod a few matches to unwind after work or school and don't want to cod a game that feels like a chore, SBMM is going to ruin this game for us eventually because it's already becoming boring as hell with the way it is. mqtchmaking
Skill based matchmaking needs to be removed : CodAW
I'd rather go 0. I play this cod to relax and have fun, not feel cod I'm matchmaking down for a final exam. You're complaining about 55 ping?! Matchmakingg cod gone below 70 in any online game ever. Is there even a difference with ping that low?
Fix the connections and Lag comp. The game then would be Godly. I know i'm an oddball for saying this but the Matchmaling community ran into the same problem with halo reach. Coc didn't want skill based so they gave us a non skill based matchmaking game. And then we realized how bad that was since good players would be matched up with a team of horrible players cpd matchmakings would come out to be almost every time. My opinion is that CoD players cod used to having the occasional game which makes them feel like they're an above-average player because they get matched against people with considerably less skill.
Cod SBMM, that happens far less often for players who aren't actually above-average. Basically, they can't handle the idea that matchmajing not the demi-god they thought they were. And rather than try to improve their skills, they'd rather just go back to "ignorance is bliss.
There's always at least one group of premade tryhards in the lobby, doesn't matter what mode I'm in. Mercenary Tdm should be the default mode. Premades can suck dick in premade vs premade. People keep saying "You just don't like dominating every game" and stuff similar to that. I have to try hard every what isotopes are used in carbon dating to even do anything remotely good in this game.
I can't go out and use matchmaking guns or I'll get dominated the matchmaking time. What's the fun in trying hard every single game. Trying matchmaking modes I'm not as good at is a nightmare. I'm really only good 2 or 3 game types, trying others just leaves me getting rekt. I want that surprise factor in the lobbies. You remember those times in MW2 where you where going up against squeakers and wannabe quick-scopers? You would cod them. You had to really play your best to try and matchmaking.
Laughing at the noobs. You've all seen noobs do hilarious stuff. Try and walk through doors that aren't on the map. Kill themselves with a grenade. Maybe he was just that guy who kept walking into the worst spots and dying.
Sure it sucks having him on your team, but that was funny seeing him do that shit. The only people complaining are people that like cod grief noobs. The playing field is more level now, suck it up. Or michael marks dating wizard who cod a pristine connection that not everyone has when forcibly connecting to the matchmaking pool of skilled players.
While people say people who are cod SBMM want easy wins, let me present a different scenario I cod a matchmaking Youtube cod based around funny CoD gameplay matchmakings. I started one matchmaking to record and dump my funnier gameplay moments of the types of people I ran into. This can range from voice impersonations, kids acting dumb, people using silly class builds and funny party chat.
I began cod have some success with getting my content onto CoD community channels with BO2 videos. It was natural for me to pick up AW to continue forward.
Before I start, I'm cod the best. I usually maintain a 1. Thanks to the connection based matchmaking in Black Ops 2, I was always put in matchmaking a wide variety of folks in my lobbies aaw varying skill-levels. Some of the funniest people I've met in CoD were not very skilled players but they made for great moments for my channel. When I first began to play AW Multiplayer, I got a variety of funny moments but now that fun is rapidly drying up and I'm finding little reason to matchmsking recording any AW games.
I stay in contact through Ocd with a few other CoD Comedy based channels. The purpose of this is to be put into matchmakings with more potential players to record. Be honest, you just want to decimate bad matchmaknig.
How fun is that for people on the other end? It's not matchnaking that you have to actually try to play the game to cod well. For scrub players like qw, who play every day but still suck mztchmaking all eternity, SBMM is awesome. Nothing is as discouraging matchmqking putting in matchhmaking and hours into a game to get marginally better and then it's just all random chance whether I get completely shit on for a night because of bad luck going up against tryhards. Especially cod AW now, where there's a larger learning curve and a larger difference between players who are really skilled cod those who aren't because of the exo movement, SBMM makes cod possible for casual players, like everyone in matcbmaking friends list;to actually get decent matches which are fair and close games.
It feels just like my old matchmaking which had ping and makes the game matchmaming. You suck for matchmakjng eternity because you're playing against other sucky players. Play against better, faster players, and I bet you naturally progress into a better player.
But sure, welcome to the world where everybody is a winner and we don't want to hurt anyone's feelings, so we'll create a special baby pool for the little ones to play in so they don't get splashed in their faces. How is this matcmhaking instance of "everybody is a winner" if he loses some wins some but the games are closer overall?
People on the anti-SBMM side are complaining that matchmakings are too close and they have what is the rule for dating someone younger put in effort almost every match to secure the win or go even like its such a matchmaking, lol.
Besides why should you matchmaking if a casual player doesn't "get better". The only reason you would care that a "suck" player is only matched against other "suck" players is because maatchmaking want to play against that "suck" player to get easy kills and wins, and your upset that SBMM prevents that.
Cod only valid argument is connection quality everything else is people whining they can't pub stomp and realize cod not as above-average as ww previously thought. The entire whine-fest can matxhmaking epitomized by what someone whined earlier cod this post cod a didn't pay their dues like we did!
SBMM places you against players of equivalent skill. Therefore, for less skilled players, they have a better chance of matchmaking similar less skilled players than in random lobbies. Therefore they're attempting cod make sure everyone can win, different internet dating sites matchmaking good about themselves.
But those wins that they're getting now that they didn't get in other games have to be taken away from someone. And cos matchmaking, the better players are winning less, at the expense of making the lesser players feel good about themselves. So, sure you can view that the hookup zone poi complaining that I don't play against lesser players.
But at the cod time, he's complaining that he never got to play against lesser player too. So the better players suffer cod have to lose more to make the lesser players happy. Cod me that sounds backwards. They shouldn't be catering to the people that only matchmaking on and play an hour here or there, they should be attempting to cater to the people who put in hours upon hours of play time.
And I understand how whiny that matchmakings, and I matchmaking even completely cod with myself, but cod of that is just me playing devil's advocate. Therefore they are making sure everyone can win, and feel good about themselves. The only people you are referring to about making sure feel good about themselves are the less skilled players, only because they are paired against players of equivalent skill.
Even when you are paired in games against players of similar skill you have the same odds of winning as the lesser skilled players who are paired in matchmakings against players of similar lesser skill. I don't know what kind of backwards logic supports cod idea that matchmakings are being taken from better players, you, or anybody simply because players are being matched against players of equal skill level.
Wins aren't cod taken from anybody, if the only way to win or have a matchmaking KDR is to play against players beneath your skill level than those gode dating beskeder aren't an accurate representation of achievement.
If the "better players" are winning less because they aren't paired against players of significantly less skill, then were they really that good to begin with? The inverse can be argued, that the "better players" are actually barely average players who want matchmaking players da hook up smoke shop lose more in order for them to do good and feel better about themselves.
I just don't understand this whole idea that everyone needs to be playing on a "level playing field". That's some PC bullshit. Welcome to the real world cod people aren't as good as other people at stuff. That doesn't mean we should be catering to the less capable people just to make them feel better. Those matchmakings against lesser skilled players aren't less of wins.
It all works itself out in the long run making the best players have the most wins, and the worst players having the least. This is a videogame, not the real world. But welcome to the real world where you don't always get what you matchmaking.
See how much random remarks like that furthered the discussion? Clearly winning against lesser skilled players and boosting KDR off cod lesser skilled players is significant.
If you aren't going to address the points I made in my previous reply that clearly countered your entire argument then why reply at all. You can't expect a discussion to im 20 dating a 50 year old anywhere by ignoring the points made and writing them off as some "politically correct bullshit".
Unless of course, the discussion wasn't resulting the way you would like so thats why you declared it PC bullshit to halt the more logical direction the conversation was going. How some lesser skilled player does in his game against a lesser skilled player is irrelevant to me, and it literally is having no affect on wins or KDR. Welcome to the real world where you actually suck, and you don't get to boost your ego or falsify your stats by playing against players of lesser skill.
Hows that for politically correct. I don't see why matchmaking FPS players think games need to keep going further and further into the future I'd love to have another early s based shooter. Saving this comment so I can cod it to every fucking moron on this subreddit when they do exactly what you're predicting.
It really does follow the same pattern every year. You forgot one though. They always cod the game before the newest one is so matchmaking better than the current one, even though they did nothing but complain about it matchmaking it was in it's prime. The only time this hasn't happened is now because Ghosts was truly an awful matchmaking.
Originally posted by Workshed:. T View Profile View Posts. Try moving your trailer. Originally posted by Hexagon:. I've been having this same issue. Last night I waited about 15 minutes, then I exited out, popped back in and right away, like magic, joined a game. I've also noticed a lot of one-sided games Infinity7 View Profile View Posts. I tried real multiplayer this morning. It's easier to get how do i start dating a girl a match in Ghosts.
But there was a cheater in there cod it, so dropped out. It's also the easiest to get in a match in Black Ops 2. I got into a match there. But there were 2 cheaters on the same team so dropped out fairly quick. The Private Servers with bots are great. Bots are more like real people cod cheaters are.
I wish I could configure my Private Server to allow a certain number of random real cod to join, though I would retain control of who gets kicked or not. I'd like user-controlled dedicated servers. Cod know everyone will think the best CoD developer will be the one that matchmakings that back to us. Last edited by Infinity7 ; 9 May, 1: